You know you live in Wyoming when….


you have a cattle run practically in your front yard.   :)   Yep.  Here it is:

In the park across the street from my house.

In the park across the street from my house.

At the corner

At the corner

Corner again

Corner again

All I can say is, stoopid tree.

All I can say is, stoopid tree.

 

Behind my house.

Behind my house.

Leaving town. Obviously don't know how to read stop signs either!

Leaving town. Obviously don't know how to read stop signs either!.

Sorry for the big branch in the last one.  It is huge, fell down in the last big wind, my brother is gonna hack it up for me in time for “Town Cleanup” day, which is in May.

I kept hearing a horn honk a while ago, I finally got up to look, thinking, “Is that in front of my house?”  The above pictures are what greeted me when I looked out.  :)

Reminds me of when I first moved here.  I was staying at my sister’s and one morning I looked out her window and yelled at her, “Sis, there are a bunch of cows in your yard!”  She didn’t believe me until she came to look.  We went out to see what was going on.  Some cows, yearlings, had been spooked and jumped a fence.  They belonged down the road about two miles.  Some guys, on 4-wheelers were on the road, in pastures, trying to round them up.  I will never forget a lady, who was providing her dogs for capturing the wayward cattle, the lady had quite a reputation up here for her dogs, and her yelling at ME to stand in the middle of the road to block them.  I just about croaked.  “Me”, I said???? In amazement.  LOL  Yeah, right.  I ran in the house.  I know that yearlings spook easier than older cows, even a city girl like me knew that, and if they had spooked once, there was NO WAY in hell I was gonna stand in front of those cows again.  My sister was a bit more game than I was.  She tried, for a few minutes. :)

Below is a short video, how come my camera batteries always run out at the WRONG time?

Ok, now I gotta go to bed!

About these ads

Orange Peels In Cattle Feed May Help Fight Foodborne Illness


Orange Peels In Cattle Feed May Help Fight Foodborne Illness.

Orange Peels In Cattle Feed May Help Fight Foodborne Illness

Watch out, foodborne illness. You have a new enemy you probably never saw coming: orange peels. A new study from the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) suggests that feeding the citrus skins to cattle can drastically reduce the prevalence of pathogenic bacteria (such as E. coli and salmonella) in cows’ gastro-intestinal tracts. Ultimately, cutting down on internal bacteria in living cows could translate into lower rates of dangerous pathogens in meat — and also help reduce the livestock industry’s dependence on potentially dangerous antibiotics.

The ARS study, lead by microbiologist Ted Callaway, brings together two long-running strains of research. The older one, stretching back as far as 1924, has demonstrated the anti-microbial properties of citrus oils time and time again.

The younger and smaller one has tried to find ways to use citrus wastes as animal feed. The Florida orange industry alone produces five million tons of orange peels and pulp, from products like orange juice and canned oranges, so the demand for a use for waste — other than the garbage dump — is high. Studies have shown that citrus peels contain a chemical, d-limonene, that is toxic to pigs and poultry. But cows, with their four stomachs, can digest orange peels without a hitch.

The ARS study demonstrated the potential antimicrobial efficacy of orange peels in cattle feed by feeding pelletized orange peel to sheep, which are ruminants like cows. (Pellets are considered more viable than raw skins because the latter are hard to ship.) The researchers then tested the digestive tract of the sheep for the presence of pathogens. They found that the orange peel pellets led to a “10-fold reduction in Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in the animals’ intestinal contents,” according to Food Safety News.

Callaway has said that his team’s next move will involve field-testing the new feed in cattle around the country.

Family Planning on the Range: The Battle Over Bison Contraceptives


Family Planning on the Range: The Battle Over Bison Contraceptives – Sarah Yager – Technology – The Atlantic.

Family Planning on the Range: The Battle Over Bison Contraceptives - Sarah Yager - Technology - The Atlantic

At feeding time, residents of the Brogan Bison Facility cluster around a hay bale, blinking at flecks of alfalfa dust that swirl in the air and settle in their shaggy coats. The herd, chewing and lowing, mills in a holding pasture near Corwin Springs, Montana, surrounded by sweeping mountain views and a seven-strand wire fence. Blue-painted squeeze chutes are settled in the dirt nearby, bordered by a swath of prairie grass that stretches for a few miles until it meets the northern border of Yellowstone National Park. This, under a graying sky beginning to spit the first snowflakes of another long winter, is the unlikely center of a contentious debate over birth control.

The bison, gathered after drifting out of Yellowstone earlier this year, are potential subjects of a USDA study of GonaCon, a contraceptive vaccine for wildlife. Originally developed by the USDA as a non-lethal form of pest control, GonaCon works by lowering the concentration of sex hormones in the bloodstream to weaken fertility and the urge to mate. The contraceptive was recently approved in Maryland and New Jersey for curbing the population of wild deer. Now researchers are hoping to use GonaCon to stop the spread of brucellosis, an infectious bacterial disease that causes pregnant ungulates to abort their calves.

The Greater Yellowstone Area is the last known reservoir of Brucella abortus bacteria, believed to have been introduced to the park’s bison by domestic cattle at the beginning of the 20th century. Roughly half the bison population in Yellowstone tests positive for exposure to the disease, which is primarily transmitted by contaminated birthing materials deposited on grazing grounds. Brucellosis also poses a threat to neighboring cattle herds when infected animals wander over the park’s invisible boundaries. Researchers from the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) are interested in whether temporary sterilization with GonaCon can prevent the shedding of bacteria-riddled afterbirth and help block disease transmission.

The USDA has spent close to two billion dollars over nearly eight decades trying to stamp out the disease, which carries hulking environmental and financial consequences. Bison who leave the park to seek food at lower elevations are routinely rounded up and quarantined, and those found to have the disease are slaughtered. When brucellosis crops up on cattle ranches, herds must be quarantined and infected members butchered. Additionally, the bacteria can pass to humans through unpasteurized milk. Jack Rhyan, a veterinarian medical officer and wildlife pathologist with APHIS, and the study’s principal investigator, said that the focus on brucellosis is driven in part by its implications for public safety. “Animal health is directly related to human health,” he said.

But while the GonaCon study is still in the nascent stages, some conservationists are already voicing concerns. Stephany Seay, media coordinator of Buffalo Field Campaign, a group that advocates for protection of the Yellowstone herd, views the USDA study as an experiment in population control. “Brucellosis is being used as a tool to manipulate the movement of wild bison,” she told me. According to Seay, GonaCon is a means of catering to ranchers who don’t want to compete with bison for grassland. “This is a centuries-old range war,” she continued.

Indeed, the interests of land-users have historically clashed with bison and their habitat. Once scattered over the Great Plains, the American bison population was demolished in the late 1800s by settlers hungry for meat, hides, and room for westward expansion. Numbers dwindled from an estimated 30 million to fewer than one thousand. By the turn of the century, Yellowstone held the nation’s only remaining wild population of plains bison. Biologists have determined in recent years that the herd is one of the last to retain genetic purity, with no traces of interbreeding with cattle.

From Seay’s perspective, the significance of the Yellowstone herd is reason to encourage tolerance over further tampering. She and the Buffalo Field Campaign have fought to expand range rights for bison. “The dispersal of wildlife lessens the prevalence of disease,” she said. “By allowing bison to roam, you’re thereby also reducing risks.” Ranchers anxious about contagion, she suggested, could immunize their animals against brucellosis rather than meddle with neighboring wildlife.

But while bison remain in the essentially artificial environment of Yellowstone National Park, bounded by a patchwork of land and legal rights, some degree of management may be necessary–even beneficial–for the animals inside. Marty Zaluski, Montana’s state veterinarian, pointed out that the goals of the USDA and bison advocates are, to some degree, in alignment. “It’s a non-lethal method to reduce the infection rate while slowing the population growth, and therefore reducing the number of animals that go to slaughter,” he said. “I really don’t comprehend why this is such a lightning rod for conservationists’ concerns when you look at the alternatives.”

Zaluski, who has also been a vocal advocate of immunization, sees GonaCon as a valuable addition to the disease-fighting quiver. He maintained that birth control could do more than buffer direct impacts of the disease in Yellowstone’s herd. “Brucellosis is limiting the ability to take the bison from this area and restore them in other parts of the country,” he said. GonaCon, with its potential to wipe out infection, could make the public more open to the concept of a free-roaming herd. “Ultimately, the entire nation loses by not being able to benefit from and enjoy Yellowstone bison.”

USDA APHIS is in the process of conducting an environmental assessment to determine whether the proposed study should move ahead. The assessment is scheduled to wrap up by early January, and the results will be made available for public comment. If approved, work could begin this spring–around the time a new generation of bison calves tests their wobbly legs.